"The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
The art of naming bills gets over the task of reading bills. The small print will become the issue. Thanks for pointing it out. We can regret at leisure knowing Till has been vindicated.
Thank you for this thoughtful write-up. Linking through to read Congressman Thomas Massie’s opposition statement is a must.
I would love for you to do similar analysis for the 21st Century Cures Act (enacted Dec 2016 during the Obama Administration allocating ~$5 billion to be spent through 2026) https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/34 , the reasons for the nays (and yeas for that matter!), how this Act relates to our current situation; notably, real world evidence (Sec. 3022), fast-tracking vaccine development (Sec. 3021)-- and in particular, questioning "what has happened to informed consent?" (Secs. 3023 & 3024), advancing precision medicine and Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies Initiative (known as the ``BRAIN Initiative'') Secs. 2011 & 2012, and whether the passing of this law and how it has been executed conflicts with the Nuremberg Code - https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code and/or the Hippocratic Oath - https://www.medicinenet.com/hippocratic_oath/definition.htm
I had a short stint in a biocomputing master's program to study the protein folding problem towards cancer research, but left the program by choice more than ten years ago. I know how new and experimental everything still is. It's been taking me some time to figure out where to focus my time as time is limited and always want to be efficient. I wish for words to be impactful and inspiring action, and not just interesting. I've been busy trying to inform my small inner circle of friends and family, which has been difficult all on its own, but now I know it's time to move to a larger audience and/or start letter writing and public speaking because the window for action is short, especially when looking at the appropriations of this Act (not just bill, but Federal Law). I have not publicly posted about the 21st Century Cures Act because to me it really is the big elephant in the room and the driving force for all of this recent push (at least in the U.S). I feel there are many wrongs that need to be set right. Feel free to take a gander at my thoughts. It is only here because it's the only place I can efficiently reach my inner circle. ( https://www.facebook.com/delores.andaluzmuller/ )
P.S. moc tod hctab ym si dab woh ... I ended up here because of the mention of your substack on Maddie De Garay's GFM page
By “interesting” I meant I’d look into it for a potential piece. I share your anxiety about feeling the need to affect change, it’s part of why I started this Substack. There are sadly many issues that weigh on my mind and many corrupt systems that are difficult to understand before we can appropriately attack them.
It is massive, both are. Instead of duplicating effort, could you take a look at the PREP Act (2005) and this https://palexander.substack.com/p/the-public-cannot-sue-pfizer-or-moderna . It is more specific to liability protection for research and development companies. It is much more manageable. In the meantime, I will be looking more closely into how the Cures 2.0 Act would need to be revised given the 21st Century Cures Act that is already in place. Removing liability protection is a critical piece and not really a part of these acts.
Agree. There's a difference between involved (e.g., instigated, enabled, propagated, concealed/misled) and affected (through ignorance, disbelief, or innocence). It is important to understand correlation vs. causation, not assigning guilt through association, normalized vs. unnormalized data, and truth over supposition or conjecture. I recognize your effort. I prefer address, elucidate or reveal over attack because in many cases something may not or cannot be known 100%. Words can also have unintended consequences another reason this effort is so difficult.
1) ensure natural law freedoms provided the Constitution are not infringed on by anything provided by this Act (yes this should be obvious, but look what happened),
2) properly protect the health of the people of the United States by removing liability protection of research and development entities (regardless of whether private or governmental), particularly in instances of fraud,
3) providing complete unabashed informed consent under all circumstances, including under emergency circumstances,
4) providing injury compensation for children completely and all adults equally using the remaining funds appropriate for these projects, and not based on whether they are a federal government employee,
5) closing U.S. owned biolabs in foreign countries and ending gain-of-function research,
6) ensuring no vaccine mandates, vaccine passports, or discriminating by vaccine status are instituted or allowed, even in an emergency,
7) reinstating and/or compensating those individuals fired or smeared trying to reveal fraud, and
8) establishing appropriate punishment for anyone instigating, hiding, misleading, coercing, or knowingly enabling or propagating the breaking of this Act in its current or revised form.
Applicable sections include at a minimum: Real world evidence (Sec. 3022), fast-tracking vaccine development (Sec. 3021), informed consent (Secs. 3023 & 3024), advancing precision medicine and Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies Initiative, known as the ``BRAIN Initiative'' (Secs. 2011 & 2012).
Please know, I am far from being a lawyer. I am just an average U.S. Citizen stating my opinion, and of course, this could all be explained better by someone well-versed in U.S. Federal Law; however, it seems overwhelming evident to me that this Act in its current form is the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about because nearly everyone was either involved or affected by it.
Related to AlphaFold, DeepMind, Google - "With all this said, it is important to note that AlphaFold has meaningful limitations. Its predictions are not always as accurate as more traditional experimental methods. It predicts one stable conformation per protein, but proteins are dynamic and may change shape as they move through the body. Edge cases—like intrinsically disordered proteins and unnatural amino acids—can trip AlphaFold up. AlphaFold generates predictions about individual protein structures, but it sheds little light on multiprotein complexes, protein-DNA interactions, protein-small molecule interactions, and the like—dynamics that are essential to understand for many biomedical use cases. And because (like any AI system) AlphaFold has learned to make predictions based on its training data, it may struggle to accurately predict the shapes of unusual new proteins, including de novo protein designs not found in nature." - ( https://www.forbes.com/sites/robtoews/2021/10/03/alphafold-is-the-most-important-achievement-in-ai-ever )
There should be no mandates anywhere if you cannot guarantee safety for all. My exemption shouldn't have to be because I'm trying to protect myself from others forceful, nonsensical, harmful rules.
In science, a good experiment requires both a control group and an experimental group. Without a control group, it is mad science. The process was rushed, and the mRNA technology is considered "new" because it had not yet succeeded in accomplishing its goals. Just because technology is new or promising, does not necessitate its success. It merely means it is an experiment. I personally witnessed the CDC edit their tweet from "experimental" to "new". It is semantics. Read information on how the process was shortened, how AI is involved to estimate and predict protein structures, how proteins can change shape as they pass through the body, and decide for yourself. With respect to synthesizing the spike protein alone, consider that it is the thorn of the entire rose that inflicts pain alone. The literature says the long term effects are not known. This is why I choose not to grab a rose stem with my eyes closed. As beautiful as it may seem, I may even choose by my own freewill not to accept the rose at all, as it is my choice.
If you give up your right to decide what's put in your body ... to speak your mind, you've pretty much given up everything.
Yes totally agree. “Hate crimes” have no business in law. I take issue with the 2009 Hate Crime Law, however, less so as you must physically assault someone to qualify. This new law is scarier for sure.
And you’re right… we all know who the bill is for.
"The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
-- Ayn Rand
So the annual odds of dying in a US domestic terrorism event is about 1 in 10 million. An absolute emergency... 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Thank you for the deep dive analysis of the latest gov't overreach, though.
The art of naming bills gets over the task of reading bills. The small print will become the issue. Thanks for pointing it out. We can regret at leisure knowing Till has been vindicated.
Thank you for this thoughtful write-up. Linking through to read Congressman Thomas Massie’s opposition statement is a must.
I would love for you to do similar analysis for the 21st Century Cures Act (enacted Dec 2016 during the Obama Administration allocating ~$5 billion to be spent through 2026) https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/34 , the reasons for the nays (and yeas for that matter!), how this Act relates to our current situation; notably, real world evidence (Sec. 3022), fast-tracking vaccine development (Sec. 3021)-- and in particular, questioning "what has happened to informed consent?" (Secs. 3023 & 3024), advancing precision medicine and Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies Initiative (known as the ``BRAIN Initiative'') Secs. 2011 & 2012, and whether the passing of this law and how it has been executed conflicts with the Nuremberg Code - https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code and/or the Hippocratic Oath - https://www.medicinenet.com/hippocratic_oath/definition.htm
Thanks for the tip Lee! Always looking to learn more so I’ll check this bill out.
I had a short stint in a biocomputing master's program to study the protein folding problem towards cancer research, but left the program by choice more than ten years ago. I know how new and experimental everything still is. It's been taking me some time to figure out where to focus my time as time is limited and always want to be efficient. I wish for words to be impactful and inspiring action, and not just interesting. I've been busy trying to inform my small inner circle of friends and family, which has been difficult all on its own, but now I know it's time to move to a larger audience and/or start letter writing and public speaking because the window for action is short, especially when looking at the appropriations of this Act (not just bill, but Federal Law). I have not publicly posted about the 21st Century Cures Act because to me it really is the big elephant in the room and the driving force for all of this recent push (at least in the U.S). I feel there are many wrongs that need to be set right. Feel free to take a gander at my thoughts. It is only here because it's the only place I can efficiently reach my inner circle. ( https://www.facebook.com/delores.andaluzmuller/ )
P.S. moc tod hctab ym si dab woh ... I ended up here because of the mention of your substack on Maddie De Garay's GFM page
By “interesting” I meant I’d look into it for a potential piece. I share your anxiety about feeling the need to affect change, it’s part of why I started this Substack. There are sadly many issues that weigh on my mind and many corrupt systems that are difficult to understand before we can appropriately attack them.
There are over 80 co-sponsors of this bill: Proposed H.R.6000 - Cures 2.0 Act 117th Congress (2021-2022) - ( https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/6000/text ) and Summary ( https://degette.house.gov/sites/degette.house.gov/files/Cures%202.0%20Section%20by%20Section%20Summary.pdf ) Latest Action: House - 01/04/2022 Referred to the Subcommittee on Biotechnology, Horticulture, and Research ( https://www.congressweb.com/NPCA/legislators/committee/cmte_id/93/ )
Scanning through a bit now, which sections are troubling in your opinion?
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/legalized-bioterrorism
Pfizer's getaway? https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/pfizers-getaway-plan?s=r
It is massive, both are. Instead of duplicating effort, could you take a look at the PREP Act (2005) and this https://palexander.substack.com/p/the-public-cannot-sue-pfizer-or-moderna . It is more specific to liability protection for research and development companies. It is much more manageable. In the meantime, I will be looking more closely into how the Cures 2.0 Act would need to be revised given the 21st Century Cures Act that is already in place. Removing liability protection is a critical piece and not really a part of these acts.
Agree. There's a difference between involved (e.g., instigated, enabled, propagated, concealed/misled) and affected (through ignorance, disbelief, or innocence). It is important to understand correlation vs. causation, not assigning guilt through association, normalized vs. unnormalized data, and truth over supposition or conjecture. I recognize your effort. I prefer address, elucidate or reveal over attack because in many cases something may not or cannot be known 100%. Words can also have unintended consequences another reason this effort is so difficult.
(Apologies for the redundacy)
I argue that the most important thing to do is see who still serves in Congress (all parties) and who voted "Yea" on:
H.R.34 - 21st Century Cures Act 114th Congress (2015-2016) during the Obama Administration
with monies appropriated through 2026 (2023 in particular) - ( https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/34/text ) and ask them to LEAD THE WAY in righting wrongs, by revising or eliminating this Act to:
1) ensure natural law freedoms provided the Constitution are not infringed on by anything provided by this Act (yes this should be obvious, but look what happened),
2) properly protect the health of the people of the United States by removing liability protection of research and development entities (regardless of whether private or governmental), particularly in instances of fraud,
3) providing complete unabashed informed consent under all circumstances, including under emergency circumstances,
4) providing injury compensation for children completely and all adults equally using the remaining funds appropriate for these projects, and not based on whether they are a federal government employee,
5) closing U.S. owned biolabs in foreign countries and ending gain-of-function research,
6) ensuring no vaccine mandates, vaccine passports, or discriminating by vaccine status are instituted or allowed, even in an emergency,
7) reinstating and/or compensating those individuals fired or smeared trying to reveal fraud, and
8) establishing appropriate punishment for anyone instigating, hiding, misleading, coercing, or knowingly enabling or propagating the breaking of this Act in its current or revised form.
Applicable sections include at a minimum: Real world evidence (Sec. 3022), fast-tracking vaccine development (Sec. 3021), informed consent (Secs. 3023 & 3024), advancing precision medicine and Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies Initiative, known as the ``BRAIN Initiative'' (Secs. 2011 & 2012).
Please know, I am far from being a lawyer. I am just an average U.S. Citizen stating my opinion, and of course, this could all be explained better by someone well-versed in U.S. Federal Law; however, it seems overwhelming evident to me that this Act in its current form is the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about because nearly everyone was either involved or affected by it.
Please encourage not only your representatives, but ALL REPRESENTATIVES to fix this sloppy, vague, overly complicated law that strongly appears to either directly (or indirectly) conflict with the Nuremberg Code - ( https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code ) and/or the Hippocratic Oath - ( https://www.medicinenet.com/hippocratic_oath/definition.htm )
"This is the most dangerous vaccine rollout in our history." - at 54:00 minutes, TN state legislative committee ( https://tnga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=610&clip_id=26334 )
mRNA technology investigated since the 60's, but not widely tested or applied until 2020 through EUA - ( https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w )
"If a simple t-shirt cannot truly be one size fits all, can you expect a new, complex drug that hasn't been tested long term to be?" - me
Parallel with changing the definition of "vaccine" this article explains -- at a very high level -- how the process has been hacked up to arrive at a "vaccine" faster. ( https://wellcome.org/news/quick-safe-covid-vaccine-development )
Related to AlphaFold, DeepMind, Google - "With all this said, it is important to note that AlphaFold has meaningful limitations. Its predictions are not always as accurate as more traditional experimental methods. It predicts one stable conformation per protein, but proteins are dynamic and may change shape as they move through the body. Edge cases—like intrinsically disordered proteins and unnatural amino acids—can trip AlphaFold up. AlphaFold generates predictions about individual protein structures, but it sheds little light on multiprotein complexes, protein-DNA interactions, protein-small molecule interactions, and the like—dynamics that are essential to understand for many biomedical use cases. And because (like any AI system) AlphaFold has learned to make predictions based on its training data, it may struggle to accurately predict the shapes of unusual new proteins, including de novo protein designs not found in nature." - ( https://www.forbes.com/sites/robtoews/2021/10/03/alphafold-is-the-most-important-achievement-in-ai-ever )
"I can't turn that care off" - Funeral Director John O'Looney ( https://www.bitchute.com/video/Lvy1gZmjpcok/ )
DR SUCHARIT BHAKDI: ORGANS OF DEAD VACCINATED PROVES AUTO IMMUNE ATTACK - 22/12/2021 - ( https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHIT55iM4Zv9 )
"safe and effective" now described as "safe and effective FOR MOST"- John Hopkins ) https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/full-fda-approval-of-a-covid-19-vaccine-what-you-should-know )
Adverse events among children ages 5–11 years after COVID-19 vaccination: updates from v-safe and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Dec 13, 2021 ( https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-12-16/05-COVID-Su-508.pdf )
Lasik is not even available for <18 because kids are still developing. ( https://www.hodgeseyecare.com/what-is-the-best-age-to-get-lasik/blog ) Please stop treating children like they are small versions of adults!
Denmark and now Germany recommend aspirating a needle when vaccinating to minimize risk, Dr. John Campbell - ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVXA9posslo )
Federal employers can receive vaccine injury compensation. Taxpayers pay for this. Shouldn't everyone be given the same coverage? - ( https://www.fedweek.com/fedweek/side-effects-of-vaccination-to-be-covered-under-feca/ )
There should be no mandates anywhere if you cannot guarantee safety for all. My exemption shouldn't have to be because I'm trying to protect myself from others forceful, nonsensical, harmful rules.
In science, a good experiment requires both a control group and an experimental group. Without a control group, it is mad science. The process was rushed, and the mRNA technology is considered "new" because it had not yet succeeded in accomplishing its goals. Just because technology is new or promising, does not necessitate its success. It merely means it is an experiment. I personally witnessed the CDC edit their tweet from "experimental" to "new". It is semantics. Read information on how the process was shortened, how AI is involved to estimate and predict protein structures, how proteins can change shape as they pass through the body, and decide for yourself. With respect to synthesizing the spike protein alone, consider that it is the thorn of the entire rose that inflicts pain alone. The literature says the long term effects are not known. This is why I choose not to grab a rose stem with my eyes closed. As beautiful as it may seem, I may even choose by my own freewill not to accept the rose at all, as it is my choice.
If you give up your right to decide what's put in your body ... to speak your mind, you've pretty much given up everything.
Proposed H.R.6000 - Cures 2.0 Act 117th Congress (2021-2022) - ( https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/6000/text ) and Summary ( https://degette.house.gov/sites/degette.house.gov/files/Cures%202.0%20Section%20by%20Section%20Summary.pdf ) Latest Action: House - 01/04/2022 Referred to the Subcommittee on Biotechnology, Horticulture, and Research ( https://www.congressweb.com/NPCA/legislators/committee/cmte_id/93/ )
Yes totally agree. “Hate crimes” have no business in law. I take issue with the 2009 Hate Crime Law, however, less so as you must physically assault someone to qualify. This new law is scarier for sure.
And you’re right… we all know who the bill is for.